[Erik Latranyi]

I’ve addressed your points and yet you want to go around in circles repeating the same points you’ve already made and me refuting them. No thanks. It’s been fun, but no thanks.

You refuted nothing.

All you did was say things were not likely to happen, but you never refuted that Trump took those positions as anti-assault weapons and pro-abortion.

[JayGalt]

To any sane poster your points have been refuted ad infinitum. You reason for a single point to the furthest position on a continuum and bray that they are the same thing. It is akin to saying that since the morning after pill can lead to a pregnancy failure anyone who does not condemn the morning after pill is pro-abortion.

[mbrfl]

I refuted your characterization of Trump as pro-abortion. Trump has spoken out often against late-term and “post-term” abortions and more recently has proposed a federal ban on such abortions. By definition, that makes him anti-abortion.

I also explained to you Trump’s comments to Feinstein. He told her to put some language into a bill that he knew would never reach his desk. That proves nothing.