Skip to comments.
House votes to censure Democratic congressman who led Trump investigations
CNN ^
| 6/21/23
| Haley Talbot and Kristin Wilson,
Posted on 06/21/2023 4:14:25 PM PDT by CFW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 last
To: CFW
A letter writer to the Daily Caller wrote the following:
If Henry Rodgers (author of article) did his homework, he would have learned that 5 of the 6 that voted Present are on the ethics committee who will be doing the ethics investigation into Schiff, which is the next step in the process. It will be that committee who will determine Schiff's fate in the House. That is why they voted Present to avoid the appearance of bias during the investigation. Only Buck does not serve on the ethics committee, so one has to ask why he voted that way. Mr. Rodgers should issue an apology to readers for inferring their Present votes were helpful to Schiff as if they were the same as no votes. The resolution passed on just 213 yeas vs. 209 nays. Their Present votes did not jeopardize the resolutions passage.
If I was in their unique position, I'd probably vote the same.
61
posted on
06/22/2023 7:49:31 AM PDT
by
EliRoom8
To: EliRoom8
62
posted on
06/22/2023 10:08:55 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson