Posted on 06/19/2023 10:00:28 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
As we all know, the 2020 presidential election was the most honest, above-board exercise of popular suffrage in the recorded history of mankind, and anyone who suggests otherwise is a racist, bigoted redneck yahoo who wants to install Donald Trump as dictator-for-life of this once-proud republic. That said, however, there has been a steady trickle of revelations suggesting that the 2020 election was not actually the pristine civics lesson that we have been forced to affirm it to have been (on pain of vilification and deplatforming). The latest is the belated release this week of the 2021 Halderman Report, which shows that Dominion Voting Systems voting machines are not quite the unimpeachable fortresses they’ve been touted to be.
This is odd in the extreme, as it was just a few weeks ago that Fox News settled with Dominion for an eye-watering $787.5 million and fired its top host, Tucker Carlson, on top of that, all for suggesting that the election may not have been up to the standard of elections in bastions of democracy such as Cuba or Zimbabwe. But on Sunday, the National Pulse reported that the Halderman Report “lays bare a litany of ‘critical vulnerabilities’ in Dominion Voting Systems’ machines, currently being used in a number of states, and in all voting locations in the U.S. state of Georgia.”
The report, which according to the National Pulse was “compiled by Prof. Alex Halderman and Prof. Drew Springall as part of the lawsuit Curling v. Raffensperger,” explains how “ballot scanners and ballot marking devices (ICX) ‘can be exploited to subvert all of its security mechanisms’ and that ‘ICX could be used to change the votes of individual Georgia voters.’”
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Exactly!
“And if it can be done in Georgia and the same machines are in use elsewhere, it can be done in other states as well.”
and all about the same time, 2 am
Tell it to Fox News.
Does FoxNews get their $$$$ back?
Machines don’t commit fraud, people do. Let’s focus on the inanimate objects in the room.
There are two essentials when designing a secure system:
The system must maintain an audit of everything that is done, and by whom, and
that audit must be protected from modification by anyone, including the root user of the system.>>> The most important audit controls are the process controls (people) around chain of custody of all the voting materials. The process builds a domain for each vote cycle. None of these processes as well as the actual collecting delivery balancing of totals counts, etc are auditable. And the centralized counting of the mail ins just make it worse. All counting should be verified at the precinct level with totals and signoffs. mail ins should also be controlled at that level. The more distributed the system is the harder it is to come up with 3 more votes per each mail in ballot as you need to involve more people. Now a centralized counter can just run the dem ballots thru two times. one guy can produce thousands of extra votes. That is the fraud. machines are just machines. I think most counties do not have the software and hardware expertise to produce machine capable ballots and counting without a high degree of error. Again these are process controls.
So here’s my question:
What effect, if any, does this “vote changing” ability have on the paper copies that each of these machines produce?
Every time a vote is cast, a paper back-up of that vote is made. This is why GA was able to do a full hand-recount.
Someone needs to send this to Bret Baier. Yesterday’s Trump interview, Baier sounded like Son Murdoch promised him Tucker’s spot at 8:00 PM if he treated Trump badly. I hope Tucker rips him a new one on TuckerOnTwitter. Any FReepers talk about this here?
2024 will be a dimrat win. 100 million votes. The dimrat party will pick the winner not the voters.
Thanks for sharing your opinion. We’ll see, won’t we.
(.....unless you’re Shrillery)
Hope you are on the mend!!!
Where do we and this report go from here?
Is anyone listening? Does anyone care?..
Is there a honest court left in the US who could review this report for relevancy and allow it to be introduced as evidence in a real trial?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.