The question becomes was the subpoena valid under the PRA and under the rules on classification of documents. A judge can sign off on a subpoena and not be inside the law. Turly seems to feel the obstruction charges are the more dangerous so we will see. But I see a lot of appeals and right now all we have is the corrupt DOJ side of things. Even Turly mentioned for any of this to be valid there has to be an under lying criminal act. They know they will lose on the classification it is a red herring for people who have never worked with classified material. The Espionage Act is a stretch. But even for obstruction they have to prove none of those records are covered by the PRA. I am not an attorney so I default to what people like Turly are saying.
The time to challenge the legality of a subpoena is before
1) surrendering SOME documents
2) certifying that you’ve done the search and complied w/ the subpoena
I agree that the obstruction charge is the most compelling thing PDJT is facing. Depending on what evidence the DoJ has to back up their accusations in the indictment (and whether or not that evidence will be a) admissible in court and b) convincing to a jury) the obstruction charge could be the whole ball game.