Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CrazyCatChick
The problem is the PRA is civil, not criminal. If the National Archives believed they had ownership of the documents they should have sued Trump not referred the matter to Justice for prosecution. The only PRA case we have decided the outgoing president decides what’s his and not his. It’s a Clinton precedent set by an Obama judge. The indictments are carefully crafted to avoid touching that defense or damning all past living presidents. We already know it wouldn’t apply to the senator Joe or VP Joe.

It’s a very political situation and unnecessary.

75 posted on 06/13/2023 11:17:33 AM PDT by newzjunkey (We need a better Trump than Trump in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey

See, this helps me to understand. So the PRA doesn’t have anything to do with the charges?

Is the PRA part of the indictment?

It still doesn’t matter regarding the indictment, does it? NARA sees that they don’t have possession of the national security documents, so it tells the FBI. President Trump’s lawyers sign off on everything being turned over. FBI investigates and raids and finds stuff.


78 posted on 06/13/2023 11:30:05 AM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson