Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newzjunkey

“ They are saying Trump was carelessly storing these documents while not charging him that way to avoid cases against Biden, Pence and the rest. ”

And that is why I think they included the audio tape. If you read the charges, Trump is not actually charged with anything related to the Milley document that Ican see. So why even include that in the indictment?

1. To obviate a defense based on the claim that Trump didn’t know he had classified documents or that he believed they were already declassified.
2. To establish intent - that knowing the documents he had were still classified, he knowingly shared them with people not authorized to have access to them.

I think they will use #2 to justify the disparate treatment. It’s BS, but I think that’s the plan.


74 posted on 06/13/2023 11:13:58 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

That is totally the plan.


76 posted on 06/13/2023 11:19:51 AM PDT by newzjunkey (We need a better Trump than Trump in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: CA Conservative; newzjunkey

RE: To establish intent - that knowing the documents he had were still classified, he knowingly shared them with people not authorized to have access to them.

Again this begs the question:

1. Who or what tells us whether or not a document has or has not been declassified?

2. To whom did he share it with and to what extent did they know the contents of a document? He might have just waved a folder and said “it’s classified here”


85 posted on 06/13/2023 11:57:26 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson