First, three 'wrongs' don't make a 'right' {Hussein Obama, Kamala Harris, Vivek Ramaswamy}. I would welcome a Congress that would conform to our laws and remove the Presidency of Barak Hussein Obama from the history books, proclamations, laws, and whatever else a US President can taint of Americana, as his father was here on a visa, so he was subject to a foreign jurisdiction, as would his child be, Barak.
As for Harris, both her parents were here on passports subject to a foreign jurisdiction when she was born. Her father later matriculated from our immigration program and became a U.S. citizen. Even he says she is not a natural born citizen.
Vivek was born of parents here, but without a date of swearing in as US citizens, we have no idea of what jurisdiction, US or foreign, he was subject to when born.
Irrelevant, she was born in the United States.....nothing else matters.
Vivek was born of parents here, but without a date of swearing in as US citizens,
Irrelevant, Vivek was born in the United States. Nothing else matters.......
Now let me ask my question again: Why wasn't the eligibility of the above ever challenged in court by barristers more knowledgable in such laws than you?
If you think you're so God damn smart on Constitutional law, then contact your Congressman and Senator and ask them why they were all allowed to run for the office of the President.
Till then, stop wasting your time trying to make an argument that has been proven false over and over again............Sheesh!
Time wasted, end of conversation.