[Macho MAGA Man]

Combine this plus Jack Smith omitting several of Trump's words from the recorded call in the transcript given to the Miami Grand Jury, THIS IS grounds for dismissal.

[MayflowerMadam]

“THIS IS grounds for dismissal.”

Ideally — in a fair world, and free republic. But who would dismiss? Nobody.

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Nick Moseder on Telegram

https://t.me/WILFMoseder/13048

"NEW: Special Counsel Smith's indictment alleges Trump showed off a military paper that he boasted was classified "highly confidential" and "secret," but the transcript reveals Trump actually said: "like, highly confidential" and "a secret." Smith omitted the words "like" and "a."

And here we go again. The biggest bombshell portion of the Jack Smith indictment - the Bedminster tape - has already been debunked

Smith tampered with the evidence

[CA Conservative]

Where did you get information that Smith omitted anything in what was presented to the Miami grand jury? I haven’t seen anything like that reported. The only thing I saw was a post from Paul Sperry claiming that Smith altered evidence by omitting a word from a quote in one part of the indictment, the the whole quote was included later in the document.

[kvanbrunt2]

I think what matters most is if the jury is made up of retards or smart people. If smart they just ask for all the stuff like supporting documents, evidence stuff like that. If they don’t get what they want then vote to acquit. simple.

[GOPJ]

For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording of the Bedminster call, which the MSNBC’s of the world have been beating a dead horse about for quite a while based on such leaks. This means that Trump lawyers could not possibly be the source of the leaks. Ergo, the leaks are coming from DOJ.

Interesting.

[M Kehoe]

Bttt.

5.56mm