Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IamConservative; Candor7; metmom; 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; ...
IamConservative :"From what I’ve read about Ivermectin, it disrupts the process of the spike protein causing micro-clotting in the blood.
They not only know it works, they exactly how it works to improve COVID outcomes."

They (NAID/FDA/CDC) KNEW ivermectin worked, and purposely and intentionally ignored their own data
in order to push the Big Pharma covid-19 'vaxxine', which wasn't even a true 'vaccine'.
They had recent reports from India where ivermectin controlled the covid virus out break.
They (NAID/FDA/CDC) even had to re-write the definition of a "vaccine" in order to accommodate and adapt to Big Pharma's genetic injection.
It was all done with intentional and premeditated "malice and forethought" (legal terms).
Even the CEO of Pfizer admitted before the European Union committee that the 'vaxxine' hadn't even been tested against covid-19 before releasing it to govt. and the general public.
Then the government made the Big Pharma 'vaxxine' compulsory, and then coerced Federal employees, military, corporate manufacturers,
and all industry to comply,or be 'Kanceled', the Fed. government became complicit to this fraud.
No one who was injected with this biologic, was ever fully informed as required in order to comply with the Nuremberg Code of medical conduct.
Let the Nuremberg Trials against humanity begin !

16 posted on 06/04/2023 6:24:50 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Tilted Irish Kilt

[[They (NAID/FDA/CDC) KNEW ivermectin worked, and purposely and intentionally ignored their own data
in order to push the Big Pharma covid-19 ‘vaxxine’,]]

They are guilty of malpractice for sure, and guilty of causing the deaths of who knows how many? And authroti3s just yawn, or worse yet, they doxxed and ruined the careers of anyone that tried to get the truth out there.

There was no legit reason to prevent people getting ivermectin as a “right to try” medicine, and no legit reason to ban its use in conjunction cation with standard emerging care for the virus. Yet they did ban it, threatening anyone who prescribed or filled the prescriptions, and deliberately lied about the dangers of the medicine when it was k own to be far saver than Tylenol and other drugs on the market otc even.

It,is clear to me that they didn’t want people adding iver to their standard care because had there been a dramatic drop in deaths as a result, they couldn’t have pushed their expensive innefective medicines anymore.
And for the record, ivermectin is far safer than remdesiver is, yet they pushed remdesiver knowing full well it would not work.


18 posted on 06/04/2023 6:48:22 AM PDT by Bob434 (question )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson