[jonrick46]

If it was a man pretending to be a pregnant woman, the magazine should have ran its cover for their Christmas issue. They could have played it as the modern day Immaculate Conception and the baby as the return of Christ.

[jonrick46]

"If it was a man pretending to be a pregnant woman, the magazine should have ran its cover for their Christmas issue. They could have played it as the modern day Immaculate Conception and the baby as the return of Christ."

I was commenting on the wrong post:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4157866/posts

Gender confusion is hitting the magazine covers. This confusion is causing me to respond to the wrong threads. This is the image from that post: