Great! Set THAT as a legal precedent!
The gun charge is the least of this mans crimes. Yet it will be used to distract from the really serious crimes.
Surrealistic, as is most of America’s Beltway in its conduct.
So? He’ll never see the inside of a jail.
There is no right or wrong in the mind of democrats - only getting over.
With all that said, you may want to sit down for what Hunter Biden’s defense will be because it will have you laughing out loud. According to Politico, if faced with a gun charge, Hunter Biden’s defense team is going to argue that banning drug users from buying guns is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.
shall not be infringed means just that.
” your honor , I wasn’t a drug user when I bought the gun .... it had been hours since my last snort.”
O ... well in that case ....dismissed.
Trump judge in OK:
Wyrick said that while the government can protect the public from dangerous people possessing guns, it could not argue Jared Harrison’s “mere status as a user of marijuana justifies stripping him of his fundamental right to possess a firearm.”
it doesn’t change the fact he SIGNED a FALSE FEDERAL document...
Sounds like Clinton-speak. He took drugs before entering the store, took more when he got into his car after leaving the store, but did not use drugs while in the store. Got it.
If I had the choice of facing
A drunk with a gun
A Tweaking meth user with a gun
or a pothead stoner with a gun
I absolutely know who I would want to face.
Hunter Biden is a crack addled maniac. He’s the last person we need having a legal gun.
Can he be charged with robbing America and then upgrade the charge to make it aggravated robbery for illegal gun possession? ;-)
It’s an idle threat, I suspect. The DOJ absolutely loves that drug users can be prohibited from possessing firearms. Potentially the reason they allow illegal drug use by not enforcing federal drug laws and enabling drug trafficking.
In an instant they could confiscate a hundred million plus peoples’ weapons from known druggies. I wouldn’t put it past them having the database ready to go today.
“......The National Firearms Act of 1934 required the registration of certain types of firearms. Miles Edward Haynes was a convicted felon who was charged with failing to register a firearm under the Act. Haynes argued that, because he was a convicted felon and thus prohibited from owning a firearm, requiring him to register any firearms in his possession was requiring him to make an open admission to the government that he was in violation of the law, which was essentially a violation of his right not to incriminate himself. ......”
I assume the DOJ will just run out the statute of limitations like they do for everyone on the “correct” side of the isle.
“Oops, we thought we had another year.”