Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10

Whole heartedly agree with your last paragraph but the top three statements are rendered moot by the passage and ratification of the 16th Amendment.

If a bad idea is passed, ratified and in the Constitution, it’s in there. Actions done on it’s basis are by definition Constitutional because it’s in the Constitution.


35 posted on 05/28/2023 11:22:33 AM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Reily; All
Thanks for replying Reily.

"Whole heartedly agree with your last paragraph but the top three statements are rendered moot by the passage and ratification of the 16th Amendment."


I respectfully disagree that 16th Amendment (16A) does anything other than to facilitate Congress's limited power to appropriate taxes.

"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

Please consider that it's actually politically correct interpretations of 16A that are used to try to justify the unconstitutionally big federal government.

For example, it's been pointed out concerning unconstitutional (imo) Obamacare, that the misguided Roberts Court seemingly "overlooked" (blatantly ignored?) that the Supreme Court had historically repeatedly clarified that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend in the name of INTRAstate healthcare. This is evidence by excerpts shown in the last part of this post which are from the writings of respected constitutional experts, including Supreme Court justices, who had emphasized that the federal government has no express constitutional authority to dictate intrastate healthcare policy.

Regarding what people claim that 16A does or does not do in the context of today's unconstitutional, unaccountable federal taxing and spending, the following excerpt from Linder v. United States (Linder) shows the following. The Supreme Court continued to clarify that the states have obviously never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend in the name of INTRAstate healthcare regardless of 16A.

No constitutionally enumerated power to establish national healthcare:

The definition of insanity is reelecting your beloved career state and federal lawmakers and executives over and over again, expecting those same government “leaders” to find remedies for unconstitutional government policies every time.

37 posted on 05/28/2023 2:22:14 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson