So what? That doesn’t justify this obviously bogus article that someone wrote and the fact that you posted it, as has been pointed out more than once on this thread. Either you and the this author are pushing a narrative you know was bogus, or you both paid zero attention and lived under a rock and have absolutely no clue what was going on in the world and Trump’s response to it for much of Trump’s tenure as President.
“So what?”
The commenter asserted that DeSantis “Didn’t pick this fight”. I corrected him. That’s what.
As far as posting the article, most of the allegations made were sourced. If the author got something wrong, point it out. That’s what we’re here for. But your feigned devotion to the truth fools no one.
Your assertion that an inaccurate statement from the author makes the entire article bogus, is faulty reasoning. The article made a number of allegations that were sourced and were accurate, all of which you wish to dismiss because of one alleged inaccuracy.
Furthermore you reveal yourself to be a propagandist at heart with comments like this:
“Either you and the this author are pushing a narrative you know was bogus, or you both paid zero attention and lived under a rock and have absolutely no clue what was going on in the world and Trump’s response to it for much of Trump’s tenure as President.”
Wow. To draw such a sweeping conclusion because the article might have had some inaccuracies, demonstrates a huge deficit in logic on your part. We’re supposed to conclude that the whole narrative is false because of one article?
There is plenty of evidence of DeSantis’s globalist connections outside of this article. But the issues has been decided because of this one article - by your account.