Posted on 05/23/2023 10:47:06 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Thank you.
Amazing we have to point out the obvious.
Try the Sixth Amendment.
Okay, provide some cases that are on point for a violation of President Trump’s Sixth Amendment rights.
The Sword of Damocles.
They’re in bold in the OP.
That’s what they’re attempting.
But it still violates the Sixth Amendment.
Pretrial gag orders are fairly common. However, they are usually there to protect the defendant. In this case, the issuance of a gag order is to set up Trump who has exhibited a lack of restraint in the past. The stage is set: Trump will be hoisted by his own petard. At least that is was the court and MSM will say.
This is not a gag order. It’s a refusal to admit evidence for the defendant, which violates the Sixth Amendment.
Do you love the Constitution?
It sure is easier to pretend things are normal and the “law” still exists. You can keep on showing respect and deference to the leftists that have perverted our institutions. As a matter of fact you should keep your head in the sand all the way to the box car.
“So you can’t speak to the law..”
What law? If there was any legal basis for the ruling, I’d speak to it, but there wasn’t - it was politically motivated.
That's not why I voted for him twice. I voted for him because he fights back. Why would you gag someone, and tie their hands behind their back when they are being attacked? That's what liberals would do to all of us.
He can use the evidence provided by the prosecutors to defend himself in court. He just can’t use it to try the case in the court of public opinion. In other words, he can’t post or say negative things about witnesses based on information he learns from the discovery from the prosecution.
This does not prevent the defense from presenting evidence in court. Or prevents Trump from publicly (outside of court) discussing the evidence he receives from the prosecution.
That’s not what the article says.
Poor writing by the author. The judge was specifically talking about Trump using the information to publicly attack witnesses, like he did with the rape accuser, the judge and prosecutor in this case, and does with anyone else that annoys him. He can still publicly attack them, as long as he doesn’t use any information included in the discovery from the prosecution.
Trump could easily resolve this all by simply...
- apologizing for kicking Hitlery’s ass in 2016
- telling Biteme that his 20mm “excess” votes were actually real
- acknowledging that the FIB and its Deep State partners were right to make up sh*t about him and his team and then harass him over it for 4 years
- thanking Nannie P for her two fake impeachments and wishing that the Senate had played along
- regretting his conservative SCOTUS appointments
- wishing he had bailed out of Afghanistan so LoopyJoe didn’t have to look so bad doing it himself
- wishing that he were the author of inflation
- declaring all nasty women saints
- grovelling in front of the press, begging its mercy
etc. etc.
She falsely charges Trump with rape and loses that charge in court yet gets $5 million when Trump rightly calls her a liar. The ‘judge’ attended her lawyers wedding as an officiator. Trump was not allowed to enter her past charges and comments. A kangaroo court.
She has charged others with rape in the past.
YIKES: E. Jean Carroll tweeted a bunch of creepy stuff including ‘sex tips she learned from her dog’
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2023/05/11/yikes-e-jean-carroll-tweeted-a-bunch-of-creepy-stuff-including-sex-tips-she-learned-from-her-dog/
________________________
This woman is a psycho. She paints rocks by a creek and trees blue.
Trump Accuser E. Jean Carroll Keeps Calling Rape ‘Sexy’, As Social Media Notices Her Story Matches a 2012 Law & Order Episode.
The notion is perhaps underscored by the fact that her story about Donald Trump raping her appears in a 2012 episode of Law and Order, featuring rape fantasists and the very same Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing rooms she claims the former President used in an attack on her.
Carroll – a Law and Order fan – first made her allegations against Trump in a 2019 book.
Among other things, Kaplan has ruled that Trump’s team cannot bring up the fact that Carroll’s litigation has been funded by Democrat billionaire Reid Hoffman.Despite having initially claimed the litigation was not receiving outside funding, she recently and apparently quite suddenly recalled that, in fact, it has had the financial backing of Reid Hoffman, a billionaire Democrat who previously “contributed more than $600,000 to the legal defense fund of… Fusion GPS, the company responsible for the creation of the Steele Dossier,” according to Trump’s legal team.
Carroll has alleged she has been subject to sexual assaults and rapes or attempted rapes by a long list of “hideous men” and others, including “a bloodthirsty, beautiful, relentless boy” aged seven or eight when she was also a child, a babysitter’s boyfriend, a camp counsellor, a dentist, an unnamed pocket knife-wielding youth she went on a date with in college, an unnamed former boss, CBS chief executive Les Moonves, and finally, Donald Trump.
https://thenationalpulse.com/2023/05/03/e-jean-carroll-keeps-calling-rape-sexy-law-and-order/
That info is in the context of the courtroom. Trump is certainly not out to taint any jury.
You can’t speak to what Trump’s intentions or goals are. But regardless, as long as he doesn’t use any evidence revealed by the prosecution, Trump can publicly say what he wants about the case.
Eh?
Why is he not free to use “evidence revealed by the prosecution” in his favor? which this extrajudicial decree does not seem to specify either way?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.