“She claimed that there was no signature verification being done at all, her own witnesses disproved that.”
Only a jackass lawyer and judge would say that a 2 second review of a ballot constituted a signature verification. The delay wasn’t because the person was verifying the signature, the delay was because the computer could not load the next image fast enough. Lawyers, judges, and people that use false flag technicalities are the scum of this earth. We are told not to believe our eyes. Those signatures were not verified and anyone with an once of common sense knows that.
“Only a jackass lawyer and judge would say that a 2 second review of a ballot constituted a signature verification.”
Or a lawyer and judge were made offers they couldn’t refuse. I think it’s no secret that the AZ judges are owned by the cartels.
During the three days I thought the judge overly favored Kari’s side. Overruled Hobbs’ attorneys’ objections. Sustained Kari’s attorneys’ objections, and granted pretty much all of their requests.
Then I figured the fix was in before the trial started. It was too much. Later he would be able to say, “I gave them every opportunity. I was fair.”
The judge noted in his ruling that there is no statutory standard for the length of time needed to male a proper verification of a signature. So how do you determine how much time is needed to do the job? What standard do you hold this against?