Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
How do they know there is information that “could pose security and safety risks for the school, its staff, and students” when nobody’s seen the manifesto?

They are lying by omission.

One might reasonably conclude that the killer left several journals and detailed project plans for assaults on several targets with specific names of people to be killed. Indeed, this has already been reported. Of course, those people who were named are not going to want to have their names disclosed. Neither do the schools want the public to be reminded of their status as targets.

There is a legitimate fear of copycats who might try to get a better score the next time.

However, the explanation sounds like a pretext for concealing the motivations of the killer and the identity of the people who encouraged and advised her with her project plans.

She does not fit "The Narrative" and her written materials very likely trace back to "Non-Profit Organizations, Confidential Informants, or employed Agents of the Federal government.

There probably is no "manifesto" as such, unless the Feds wrote one as a cover story.

46 posted on 05/16/2023 5:21:50 PM PDT by flamberge (It turns out that you can fool most of the people, most of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: flamberge

I’m speaking from memory but I recall one description went: ‘journals, diaries and writings that constitute a manifesto’ ... words of that nature that seemed to imply it wasn’t a single writing but a collection.


47 posted on 05/16/2023 5:26:38 PM PDT by shadowlands1960 (We live in a world of intolerance masked as tolerance. RUSH LIMBAUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson