[jpp113]

Nor does the Executive branch, which is what this addresses in certain technical cases. IOW, Chevron is about courts giving deference to the applicable administrative agency on technical subjects/issues in regard to regulation. For instance, if ATF defines gun furniture as a gun, Chevron says the courts should not interfere with that definition. A roll back of Chevron would allow the court to examine that definition and if it thinks it is erroneous, the Court can strike it down. Rolling it back is sorely needed to reign in the rampant BS with this mis-administration.

[scrabblehack]

Hmm..in civil cases, ambiguities in the contract are usually settled against the party that drew up the contract, no?