Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What The Supreme Court’s Upcoming Battle Over Chevron Deference Could Mean for Gun Rights
TruthAboutGuns ^ | 5/8/23 | Cody Wisniewski

Posted on 05/09/2023 1:35:51 PM PDT by CFW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: CFW

One factor. Since Chevron the left has intentionally made laws vague so they would pass. They would never pass if explicit.


21 posted on 05/09/2023 5:00:53 PM PDT by spintreebob (ki .h g)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I didn’t say that they couldn’t do it.

I only said they have no authority to do so.

They get away with it because the people are ignorant of the constitution or as in “gun control” they agree with violating it and ignore the violations!

Then again there is a third reason: The people are lazy and stupid!<-—(my personal belief!)🤣


22 posted on 05/09/2023 9:56:43 PM PDT by justme4now (Our Right's are God given and I don't need permission from politicians or courts to exercise them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack

Yes, contracts are strictly construed against the drafter. However, that is only used if the the drafting party complains that 1) its own drafted contract is or is not ambiguous and 2) the definition of terms used by the non-drafting party is erroneous. I do not see ATF or any other alphabet agency ever admitting its own regulations are drafted in an ambiguous fashion. Stranger things have happened though, so who knows.


23 posted on 05/10/2023 8:48:55 AM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lou Foxwell
It actually doesn't apply to state agency actions. In order to fight a state agency's ultra vires acts, you have to utilize that particular state's administrative procedure statutes & case law. The Feds have their own Administrative Procedures Act and Chevron only applies to that.
24 posted on 05/10/2023 8:55:40 AM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Did you know that FDR and the fight over establishing executive branch agencies is the origin of the saying "A stitch in time saved nine"?

FDR had threatened to add more Justices to the Supreme Court in order to get his way. SCOTUS, under threat, backed down in its opposition to executive branch agencies making regulations. That is why we still have only 9 justices on the USSC. And also why there is reticence to convene an Article V COS; Blue states will want to add more justices to load and bias the court.

25 posted on 05/10/2023 9:02:10 AM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jpp113

Yes, I knew.

As for your fear of an Article V COS, We the People over the decades have surrendered our sovereignty to Scotus, Congress and the Exec branch which amends our Constitution at-will.

It wasn’t supposed to be this way.

I don’t know where the accelerating tyranny will end, but I am certain that history will not look well upon a once free people who gaffed off the Framers’ gift in Article V.


26 posted on 05/10/2023 12:03:02 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson