Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mark17

Heh, he made other claims, like SR-71s would make lazy circles to toy with MiG pilots.

Which of course, is silly considering the high-value and rarity of the aircraft. Not to mention the complicated logistics of refueling.

I once asked a KC-10 boom operator how they did it (though it was probably KC-135). He said we draw from the same tanks.

I was like, no, you’re not capable of burning JP-7. The SR-71 was about 3 years from being retired at that point.

Maybe no KC-10s were involved in refueling the SR-71?


23 posted on 05/01/2023 2:14:17 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


[I once asked a KC-10 boom operator how they did it (though it was probably KC-135).]

though it was probably KC-135s that did most, if not all, of the refuelings.

They guy I spoke with was definitely KC-10 crew as they were standing outside of their aircraft.


24 posted on 05/01/2023 2:16:51 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: SaveFerris

KC135Q were the tankers for the SR71. Special fuel.


27 posted on 05/01/2023 3:04:26 AM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson