Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Pat Fallon to Newsmax: Trump 'Fabulous' in 'Thwarting Putin'
NewsMax ^ | Saturday, 29 April 2023 06:51 PM EDT | Eric Mack

Posted on 04/29/2023 4:38:21 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: fieldmarshaldj

President Reagan destroyed the Soviet Union and forced KGB Putin to drive a St Petersburg taxi in the aftermath. And Putin and his groupies still hold a grudge.


21 posted on 04/29/2023 5:52:39 PM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

How much does Soros and his WW3-loving globalists pay you to spam Free Republic ? We’re sick of your constant spamming of their globalist lies and propaganda.


22 posted on 04/29/2023 6:01:19 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

He killed 200 Wagner when they attacked an American outpost in Syria and Putin couldn’t do anything but quietly visit the relatives of the dead because it was against the law to have Wagner there.


23 posted on 04/29/2023 6:06:44 PM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Putin was forced into driving a taxi cab thanks to President Reagan and his policies towards dismantling Russia and the Soviet Union without firing a shot. Live with it.


24 posted on 04/29/2023 6:08:42 PM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

You never answer questions, just post more spam and talking points for your globalist masters.


25 posted on 04/29/2023 6:09:58 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

The truth about what President Reagan did to Putin and the Soviet Union is globalist talking points? Alrighty then…


26 posted on 04/29/2023 6:18:58 PM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Spam.


27 posted on 04/29/2023 6:22:58 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
Because Trump set the kind of tough tone needed and wasn’t interested in the kind of provocations Biden and Zelensky staged to egg Russia into attacking.

More than a tough tone. The Left used to seem to try to alarm people in reporting:

"When you actually look at the substance of what this administration has done, not the rhetoric but the substance, this administration has been much tougher on Russia than any in the post-Cold War era," said Daniel Vajdich, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. Take military spending: Trump sought to add $1.4 billion for fiscal year 2018 to the European Deterrence Initiative — a military effort to deter Russian aggression that was initially known as the European Reassurance Initiative. That's a 41 percent increase from the last year of the Obama administration.

The president also agreed to send lethal weapons to Ukraine — a step that Obama resisted. And Trump gave U.S. forces in Syria more leeway to engage with Russian troops... "Those loosened rules of engagement have resulted in direct military clashes with Russian militants and mercenaries on the ground, actually resulting in one incident in hundreds of casualties on the Russian side," Vajdich said.

The administration has also imposed sanctions on dozens of Russian oligarchs and government officials... tough policies...have to be weighed against Trump's rhetoric, which is consistently friendly to Putin. ."There's a real disconnect between the president's words and the underlying policy," said Richard Fontaine, president of the Center for a New American Security. - https://www.npr.org/2018/07/20/630659379/is-trump-the-toughest-ever-on-russia

And from from 12/26/17 there is

Trump Sends Tank-Killing Missile To Fight Russia in Ukraine, But What Can It Do? By John Haltiwanger On 12/26/17 at 5:53 PM EST The decision to sell the Javelin missiles also comes not long after the Trump administration approved a limited weapons sale between American manufacturers and Ukraine of Model M107A1 sniper systems, ammunition and associated equipment...It's fired from the shoulder and tracks targets via infrared (heat signature). Instead of targeting the front or sides of tanks, which are thick with armor, the missile flies in an arc and hits the top of tank where the armor is weak..
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko defended the move in a Facebook post, thanking President Donald Trump for his support. Poroshenko further described the arms sale as "a transatlantic vaccination against the Russian virus of aggression." - https://www.newsweek.com/trump-tank-killing-missile-fight-russia-ukraine-759745

And as reported by abcnews.go.com om Dec. 23, 2020,

"Previously, as reported by ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News, Headlines & Videos om Dec. 23, 2020, "Trump admin approves new sale of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine.." The new package included Javelin anti-tank weapons, 150 missiles and two launchers, which came after a first sale, completed in March 2018, which included 210 Javelin missiles and 37 launch units.. "The Trump administration first approved the sale of Javelins to Ukraine in December 2017 -- a step that former President Barack Obama never took.... ..

Before that, "Russia's Putin praises Obama's missile defense decision" to "cancel a radar installation in the Czech Republic and ground-based interceptors planned for Poland," LA Times Sep 19, 2009

And those who protest NATO's overall spending of only about 3% of its GDP are opposing Trump. For contrary to being a Putin puppet as the Left prevaricates - and who were blaming him in Feb. 2020 for this invasion,


July 11, 2018 U.S. President Donald Trump told NATO leaders on Wednesday they should increase their defense spending to 4 percent of their country’s economic output, double the group’s current goal of two percent/
4/3/19
..nearly all 29 NATO members have increased their defense spending since Trump came to office, and at least 16 of the 29 are on track to meet their 2024 defense spending goals. Defense spending among 27 NATO allies has increased consistently between 2016 and 2018, with Hungary, Norway, Romania and Turkey making some of the biggest increases.

October 21, 2020 NATO spending has increased for the sixth consecutive year thanks to new contributions from allies, Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said in prepared remarks Wednesday...Canada and European countries' spending increased this year at a rate of 4.3 percent...Russia and China's aggressive behavior during Trump's term is one reason for the allies' increased spending.

Meanwhile, when procurement costs are taken into consideration (how much it cost for training and materials in respective countries relative to what they spend), then despite having far less to defend, the US military budget in 2019 was not larger than the next eleven countries. Rather it was smaller than the next three.

 https://www.eurasiareview.com/11102021-debating-defense-budgets-why-military-purchasing-power-parity-matters-analysis/

Both Putin and Biden seek victory for their legacy. If Trump was in office and provided aid to Ukraine the Left would be warning about provocations and reporting the negative side it avoids now. Both the anti-evangelical Putin and the Left are at war with God.

28 posted on 04/30/2023 6:04:30 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him who saves, be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Donald Trump talked tough on North Korea and Russia but was willing to meet Putin and Kim Jong Un face to face at the same time.

Trump talked tough and carried a big stick.

Biden pokes the stick around hoping to get a response from other side very very dangerous potentially disastrous.


29 posted on 04/30/2023 6:49:36 AM PDT by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
Donald Trump talked tough on North Korea and Russia but was willing to meet Putin and Kim Jong Un face to face at the same time. Trump talked tough and carried a big stick. Biden pokes the stick around hoping to get a response from other side very very dangerous potentially disastrous.

China feared Trump more.

30 posted on 04/30/2023 7:29:26 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him who saves, be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

China feared Trump more.


Nobody fears Trump now, though. The CCP owned Trump on Covid. Then they saw him abandon his J6 supporters and continue to endorse near every RINO he’s ever met.


31 posted on 04/30/2023 4:56:58 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson