Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON

Good.


37 posted on 04/30/2023 11:30:18 AM PDT by GailA (Constitution vs evil Treasonous political Apparatchiks, Constitutional Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: GailA

“4 Mr. Maag distinguished a flare launcher from a grenade launcher and advised the Court
that the exemplar identified by Defendants as a grenade launcher (Doc. 37-3) appears to be
a Tac-D, which is a rescue, assistance, and/or self-defense device that does not involve the
use of fragmentation devices. The device is often referred to as a flare launcher, flare gun, or
Very gun and is commonly used for safety by hunters, and for rescue operations. In fact, such
a launcher is required by the U.S. Coast Guard on larger vessels on navigable waterways for
launching flares. (Doc. 88, pp. 40-44).”

That is a quote of a footnote on page 7 of the opinion. I wonder how many boats in Illinois are required to have a flare gun per Coast Guard regs.


38 posted on 04/30/2023 12:09:34 PM PDT by nomorelurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson