Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden shrugs off age concerns, saying 'I feel good'
Channel News Asia ^

Posted on 04/26/2023 9:35:14 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Colinsky

RE: his still-strong plagiarism skills.

He’d better not steal from Canned Heat’s song Hell’s Just On Down the Road. Lead singer Bob Hite was gone not long after.


41 posted on 04/27/2023 9:55:57 AM PDT by frank ballenger (You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Do you seriously think a big chunk of 265 million jabbed Americans have suffered serious adverse effects?
More than 1 million? Can media stay silent if there were mass casualties?

Of course EVERY MEDICAL PROCEDURE had risks.
Even elective plastic surgery has risks. I never said covid vaccines are without risk.

My whole point is, from the data I have seen, 99.7% did not report serious adverse effects. Why does that bother you? FBI will not raid your house at dawn if you skip the jabs


42 posted on 04/27/2023 10:21:33 AM PDT by entropy12 (Food is most popular anxiety drug, exercise is the least popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

How about we do what the Montana legislature did and vote out the weirdo.


43 posted on 04/27/2023 10:24:41 AM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12; All
Your argument is basically, "Aw, come on! You know, the thing, man!"

It is pointless to debate this issue without clearly framing it - and, especially, without unambiguously stating the end goal of that debate.

We can argue about what constitutes a "big chunk" (your expression) of the American population and what is meant by "serious" adverse effects until the cows come home.

That is ultimately irrelevant!

Is your end goal to ridicule those who felt that it was an outrage that various federal agencies and numerous state governments were foisting an unapproved "treatment" (later retro-actively redefined as a "vaccine") on an unsuspecting public?

Is your end goal to minimize the obvious malfeasance and numerous irregularities that were committed / which occurred during the distribution of said "treatment?"

Is your end goal to minimize the illegality of imposing draconian measures on the entire populace and the coercive methods used to enforce compliance - including but not limited to depriving millions of working people of their employment, and thus endangering them existentially?

Is your end goal to excuse the collusion of the media, Big Pharma, and government in suppressing, vilifying, and punishing differing opinions - tantamount to declaring them Thoughtcrime? Because "the ends justify the means?"

Is your end goal to "sweep under the rug" the criminal negligence associated with the quarantine measures (incl. shoving infected persons into rest homes, where elderly inmates then fell victim to the disease)?

I could go on...

Regards,

44 posted on 04/27/2023 11:25:11 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

A big chunk would be a million.
Lockouts is a separate issue. Those are counter-productive.
The vax was 99.7 % or more safe from serious effects.


45 posted on 04/27/2023 12:02:35 PM PDT by entropy12 (Food is most popular anxiety drug, exercise is the least popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Lockouts is a separate issue.

No, you are attempting to arbitrarily separate individual aspects of an overall pattern of violating our dignity and rights.

Like saying that the mere (initial) requirement that Jews wear Yellow Stars can be viewed separately from the extermination of millions of Jews in the Holocaust.

It was all "part and parcel" of a consistent pattern of threatening, badgering, limiting access to public services, shaming tactics, gaslighting, censoring, etc.

Once they saw how successful this overall campaign of incremental indignities had been, it was child's play for slimeballs like NY Governor Andrew Cuomo to then enact truly authoritarian tactics, like shoving infected persons into Old Folks' Homes.

Regards,

46 posted on 04/27/2023 1:36:01 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson