Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons

I notice you didn’t say it wasn’t true. But at least he was British.


28 posted on 04/20/2023 3:11:59 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
It IS untrue; Henry VIII was 18 when he became King.

And the present day Royals ARE Brits!

Do you really want to go all the way back in history to find an 100% indigenous Brit king? There wasn't one, for all of England!

William the Conqueror was a Norman; part French, part Viking and he was the first king who was king of the whole nation and not just parts of it.

And well before the Germans came in, there had been intermarriage spouses from France and other nations.

James I was a Scot, for instance.

32 posted on 04/20/2023 3:26:35 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson