Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right
(By the way, yes there was fraud. See my tagline. But no outsider has the tools to prove it.)

The vote fraud in 2020 is one of those things where if you're trying to prove the fraud by looking at it extremely closely, it can be difficult. But looking at it from a distance, it is so obvious it is ridiculous. It might be more difficult to prove individual acts of fraud, but when one looks at the supposed votes for Biden vs Trump, it is blatantly obvious.

81 million votes for Biden, more than any other president, ever, but combined with the 74 million votes for Trump, it is a total of 155 million votes.

Vote totals in 2016 were roughly 63 million for Trump and 66 million for Hillary, for a total of roughly 129 million votes.

So, not only are we supposed to believe that, in an election where the incumbent gained 11 million votes from the previous election, he still lost by 7 million, but that 26 million more people overall voted in the 2020 election than in the 2016 election, a 20% increase in voter participation. 20%!

That, in itself, would be a political miracle. But we're supposed to believe that the man that motivated that kind of surge in voting is a demented, corrupt, unlikeable, child-abusing pedophile who can't fill a high school gymnasium with supporters.

People can argue about voting machine algorithms, ballot mules, and 3am vote counting irregularities all they want, but to me the details are almost a distraction from the mathematical impossibility of the big picture.
102 posted on 04/20/2023 1:22:12 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: fr_freak

As far as I’m aware no one did the simplest possible check:

1) Take a 1000 random mail-in ballots
2) Ask the supposed voters if they cast those ballots

Find even a couple that didn’t vote and you can prove phony votes were added to the ballot stream.

Unfortunately they succeeded in having us focus almost entirely on the machines instead of the paper.


107 posted on 04/20/2023 1:30:01 PM PDT by Renfrew (Muscovia delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: fr_freak

Your analysis has merit. It’s like being at a poker game where some guy, when he’s the dealer, ends up with four-of-a-kind every time.

That’s so mathematically rare as to be impossible. He’s cheating. But you can’t really hang him unless you actually see him deal from the bottom of the deck.


111 posted on 04/20/2023 1:34:41 PM PDT by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson