If the facts stated by the Judge are correct, and if it is indeed Pezzola smashing windows, then Pezzola makes a pretty poor case for himself.
Per the Judge (Kelly):
“Pezzola identifies footage—of other people—treating the Capitol ‘respectfully’ after entering it,” Kelly wrote.
“He concludes ‘that the Senate chamber was never violently breached’ and that there is no ‘evidence of any raucous or extremely disruptive or violent demonstration in the Senate chamber.’
“But Pezzola has not shown how any of this relates to an element of an offense with which he is charged—or how it relates to him at all,” the judge wrote. “Thus, it does not tend to show his ‘freedom from fault, guilt or blame.’”
the judge wrote. “Thus, it does not tend to show his ‘freedom from fault, guilt or blame.’”
/\
So.... he has to
PROVE his innocence ?
That’s upside down and this whack job is not a judge but a commie domestic terrorist rogue .
And, btw, that’s exactly what the exculpatory evidence did , it proved there was no crime committed , only a scripted coup.
So much for the trite concept 'innocent until proven guilty' found in our U.S. Constitution.
Given the new face mask tech of the FBI, that person breaking the window could be any one of the 40 FBI actors in a mask.