Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68; All

No...a little more nuanced. I don’t know what this law says, I’m just pointing out how weird it is to say life begins at conception and then say you have 6 weeks to snatch that life consequence free. As far as the politics, he’s obviously trying to put himself to the right of Trump so he has a chance in the primary. I doubt the country is where this bill is. If there are really no exceptions then I’m not there. The life of the mother should ALWAYS be an exception (you can define what that means). If you have to choose one life over the other it’s a tough choice but it IS a choice you should have. There is no need to deny that the baby is a life and a human being but...so is the mother. Whose life continues is absolutely up to the family. Imagine your wife was going to die to have the baby and there was nothing you could do to help. Nope, I’m not on-board. I consider my position a 100% pro life position. To pretend their I’d no nuance to this is silly.


29 posted on 04/14/2023 8:22:30 AM PDT by wiseprince (Me,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: wiseprince

I’ve never heard of a pro-life bill that didn’t include the life of the mother and usually rape and incest.


43 posted on 04/14/2023 9:20:29 AM PDT by skr (Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people. - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson