Skip to comments.
They couldn't find the Supreme Court leaker who put Supreme Court Justices lives in danger but magically they can find 21-year-old low level National Guardsman...
Twitter ^
| 4/13/2023
| Marjorie Taylor Greene
Posted on 04/13/2023 6:28:22 PM PDT by Nextrush
They couldn't find the Supreme Court leaker who put Supreme Court Justices lives in danger, but magically, they can find 21-year-old low level National Guardsman "responsible" for exposing the truth about Ukraine.
And the same people that want to take away your guns, are waging war, in a foreign country, without permission from congress.
Think about that.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: leaker; marjorietaylorgreene; mtg; thefrogbot; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
1
posted on
04/13/2023 6:28:22 PM PDT
by
Nextrush
To: Nextrush
Still waiting and the trans mass killer manifesto...
2
posted on
04/13/2023 6:29:08 PM PDT
by
2banana
(Common ground with islamic terrorists-they wacnto diese for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
To: 2banana
Don’t mention it, I’m from the FBI...sarc
3
posted on
04/13/2023 6:30:45 PM PDT
by
Nextrush
(FREEDOM IS EVERBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
To: Nextrush
Traitor Roberts still traitoring....
4
posted on
04/13/2023 6:30:56 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Nextrush
That’s easy, Roberts was the leaker, he didn’t want the conservative justices to overturn Roe v. Wade, so he thought, by leaking the information they would limit their opinion just to the case at hand.
5
posted on
04/13/2023 6:31:06 PM PDT
by
Yogafist
(Voting rino is voting for the managed decline of America.)
To: 2banana
When will the Feds come clean on the LV shootings?
6
posted on
04/13/2023 6:31:34 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Nextrush
The should probably ask the national guardsman who leaked the Supreme Court info.
7
posted on
04/13/2023 6:32:15 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(Guns don't kill people, Democrats do. )
To: Nextrush
This story reminds me of an account I heard of a Navy sailor who was sent to Leavenworth for taking classified documents back to the barracks to study for a promotion test. The documents were merely classified for training purposes.
8
posted on
04/13/2023 6:32:54 PM PDT
by
LukeL
To: Nextrush
Stinks worse than an overflowing porta-John on a 120º day.
To: Nextrush
Well, they didn’t interview any supreme court justice. So there’s that.
10
posted on
04/13/2023 6:34:23 PM PDT
by
Fuzz
(. )
To: Nextrush
Since no US military is engaged directly in the fighting, we’re not fighting a war. The amount of hysterical nincompoopery coming from the right about Ukraine is really something.
11
posted on
04/13/2023 6:35:33 PM PDT
by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
To: Nextrush
They can do all sorts of things
WHEN THEY WANT TO
12
posted on
04/13/2023 6:38:43 PM PDT
by
NWFree
(Sigma male 🤪)
To: pierrem15
The US said to have 14 Special Forces in Ukraine for sure the British 50.
Our weapons and ammo are killing Russians that’s definitely going on.
13
posted on
04/13/2023 6:39:07 PM PDT
by
Nextrush
(FREEDOM IS EVERBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
To: pierrem15
The amount of hysterical nincompoopery coming from the right about Ukraine is really something. OK, Vlod stooge.
14
posted on
04/13/2023 6:40:10 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: Nextrush
15
posted on
04/13/2023 6:41:17 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: Nextrush
They did not want to find the leaker.
16
posted on
04/13/2023 6:41:27 PM PDT
by
Reno89519
(Go Woke, Go Broke. )
To: Nextrush
They absolutely could find the Supreme Court leaker . . .
. . . If they wanted to.
17
posted on
04/13/2023 6:41:59 PM PDT
by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
To: Nextrush
This whole thing is just too slick for me to buy the whole story. News papers had the story before the “Gubernment” announced it???
18
posted on
04/13/2023 6:42:51 PM PDT
by
WellyP
(question!)
To: Nextrush
It is obvious it was on purpose to protect the midterms.
Why didn’t the Court wait until after the midterms?
There you go.
19
posted on
04/13/2023 6:47:51 PM PDT
by
eyedigress
(Trump is my President!)
To: Reno89519
They did not want to find the leaker.“
I don’t think that is accurate. It was either Roberts or he knew within a week who it was and it was one of the rats and he protected them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
