It’s massive fraud.
This why I think Mike Lindell is a nut to keep harping on the machines and trying to get rid of them, in Nevada even if you got rid of all of them, you would still have massive voter fraud.
You have to change the laws and people to make progress on cleaning up the voting process in this country.
Universal mail-in voting is far worse than any of the machine issues, machines are not inherently committing fraud, it’s the people and voting process that is corrupting the elections.
Worst way for who exactly? Certainly not for the DEMs, who are doing whatever they want with the various election systems across the country without being punished for it.
Maybe we should adopt the dye on the finger approach?
The Democrats would collapse.
Need paper ballots and in-person. Only absentee should be on request and carefully scrutinized. The cost and fraud potential of sending out ballots to everyone is outrageous.
“An analysis by the Public Interest Legal Foundation found that 8,036 mail ballots were rejected by election officials. To put this figure into perspective, the Nevada Senate race between Laxalt and Masto was decided by 7,928 votes.”
So what?
8,000 rejected ballots is a tiny fraction of the 500,000+ mail-ins that were returned.
The breakdown of rejected mail-in ballots show:
2,133 were from registered Democrats;
2,307 were from Republicans;
3,596—were from “other.”
No conspiracy involving rejected mail-ins.
The problem is with the massive amounts of mail-ins automatically sent to every registered voter.
Ping