Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CraigEsq
" However, I do not know if there have been any cases testing its applicability to criminal cases, where more stringent due process considerations are in play."

I would take the side that the Constitution would come in to play with the defendant having the right to a speedy trial unless the defendant waives that right. The Governor cannot waive that right for him. Your post is highly interesting, and I wonder if they will try to bring Coumo's XO up regarding a criminal trial. If they do though, they will then have to show instances where this happened. In crime ridden New York where the criminals are beloved, it might be the case that the New York DA would NOT rely on the XO so as to deliberately run out the clock on New York's privileged felons.

12 posted on 04/10/2023 9:24:14 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise

“I would take the side that the Constitution would come in to play with the defendant having the right to a speedy trial unless the defendant waives that right.”

So the issue of speedy trial comes after a defendant is charged. It doesn’t have anything to do with statutes of limitation.


47 posted on 04/10/2023 7:30:52 PM PDT by CraigEsq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson