Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: desertsolitaire

Replacing coal fired plants would be foolish.

Coal fired plants can be used for load following (changing power output for changing grid loading).

Replacing aging Nuk Plants and adding plants for increased load on the grid is what we need.

There are about 100 operational Nuk plants today.

most of them are 40 years old. That is their design bases life.

Most them are applying for 20 year life extensions or already have them.

So, just to maintain the status quo I would say we need another 100 Nuk plants.


23 posted on 04/06/2023 6:37:43 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Pontiac

Thank you.
I like the idea.
Keep everything we have that is functionable and add 100 new nuclear plants plus sufficient breeder reactors plants to reprocess spent fuel for all. Harden the grid against EMP.
Add natural gas and htdro for more redundancy and back up.


25 posted on 04/06/2023 6:53:53 PM PDT by desertsolitaire (Nothing Changes if Nothing Changes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac
Most them are applying for 20 year life extensions or already have them.

A lot of them will expire in 2040. And it will be time to build new reactors. But the political will won't be there.

27 posted on 04/06/2023 10:53:56 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson