He’s struggling to say what laws were even broken
Yes, sounds like a kid in class unprepared with details, not once has he stated a specific law, the specific act that violated. He loves the broad brush, thinks that is enough.
What #36 said - 34 references to potentially illegal activity but no absolute statement that a specific law was broken.
The Fox lawyer stated that the absence of a statement naming a specific crime means that the whole crap sandwich will probably be tossed.
When that happens the story will be on section F page 34 of the NYTimes right after the running body count of the Russian nuclear attack on WDC.