Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706; P-Marlowe

All are 2017.

All are checks/vouchers supposedly falsified in terms of their ledger entry.

I doubt the president did his own accounting. As Jarret or Dershowitz says, who reveals in a public record and NDA. The whole point is not to disclose it.

If the NDA is legal, then the non-descriptive entry must also be legal.


24 posted on 04/04/2023 1:38:38 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
If the NDA is legal, then the non-descriptive entry must also be legal.

Not only that, but per the DOJ plea deal with Cohen, the Trump Foundation recorded the expenses as "legal expenses". Paying your lawyer to execute an NDA is certainly a legal expense. The DOJ's only claim was that these expenses occurred in 2016, not 2017. An absolute crock.

"The Company (Trump Foundation) accounted for these payments as legal expenses. In truth and in fact, there was no such retainer agreement, and the monthly invoices COHEN submitted were not in connection with any legal services he had provided in 2017.

32 posted on 04/04/2023 2:13:26 PM PDT by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson