You claimed “Here’s an example of air defense upgrades”.
I proved you wrong.
You claimed the US subsidized Finland’s F-35’s.
Again, I proved you wrong.
Now you move on to something else. It’s like debating a 4 year old.
You’re incoherent. I said the Finnish border is RELATIVELY unarmed. Compared to what it’ll be in 3 years, I am absolutely right. You’re trying to peddle the absurdity that only Finnish bought and paid for weaponry will be in Finland. There will hundreds of billions of dollars worth of American, German, British, Italian, etc. weaponry there, just like in every other NATO country. You proved nothing but your complete lack of understanding what NATO is and how it operates.