the scum on the left charge the victim claiming that the victim had disarmed the man so he was ‘no longer a threat’ and by shooting the criminal, while he was unarmed, it was a case of ‘attempted murder’
what they leave out is that the victim had no way of knowing if the criminal had another gun on him or some other weapon, and was fully within his right to keep defending himself against someone who, in no uncertain terms’ meant to murder the victim-
Great points
Having been shot he had no way of knowing how long he would remain conscious and in control.