Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

This..

“(2) what state or municipal action is needed to address negative online behaviors that consider a citizen’s right to freedom of speech versus an individual’s right to be free from harassment including, but not limited to, potential changes in state law concerning additional penalties or enforcement of online harassment, and”

... will be used to benefit faggots, transtwits and water elon greens.


6 posted on 04/01/2023 3:41:39 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosophers )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rurudyne

Watermelon ... dumb pudgy fingers....


7 posted on 04/01/2023 3:42:23 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosophers )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

“an individual’s right to be free from harassment”

There is the problem right there, a non-existent right based on feelings.


39 posted on 04/02/2023 4:50:34 AM PDT by machman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

“an individual’s right to be free from harassment”

Dear would-be Democrat Tyrants.

Where is that “Right” enumerated exactly? Or is this another emanation from a penumbra, that you idiots are so fond of.

Also, please define “harassment”.
Be precise.

Someone wringing mean things about you doesn’t qualify.


49 posted on 04/03/2023 7:57:41 AM PDT by Jotmo (Whoever said, "The pen is mightier than the sword." has clearly never been stabbed to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson