“When a public official is indicted, I think with regard to the office, the office is more important than the person and they should step aside. That standard should apply here,” he said in reference to Trump, according to The Hill. “It is a distraction. It is not a good day for America, but the system has to play out here and we have to have confidence that it can.”
Hutchinson did admit he “would not have brought” the case were he in Bragg’s position and warned that the chargers needed to be “very substantive” to avoid the appearance of a political prosecution.
How does he reconcile these seemingly contradictory positions? Someone should not run for office while under indictment, but the indictment should not have been brought in the first place?
Many politicians are quite good at talking out of both sides of their mouth.
Behold the bucket of warm spit the modern “Republican” represents.
“Democrats” fvç& everything up, “Republicans” make damn sure it stays that way. This has been going on for decades.