[Fido969]

The lack of signature verification in the Arizona clown “audit” infuriated me. Plenty of trolls yapping about ballots printed on rice paper, Dominion machines and the supposed “chain of custody” only DISTRACTED from the obvious problem with the ballot harvesting.

And when did the auditors (or the ‘pubs supervising the audit) demand that the signature be checked?

They were either in on it, didn't care or were stupid.

[Yo-Yo]

Strangely, the Reyes case was mysteriously suppressed from legal research, so it was almost impossible to find until Heath stumbled on it.

Amazing what can happen when the Deep State also controls Lexus/Nexus.

[pghbjugop]

For once I got sucked into reading a long post and as it seemed too good to be true I realized I forgot to look at the source and when I finished and did and it wasn’t GP, it made my day!!!

[ryderann]

I always searched the BOOKS.

[rdcbn1]

Predictably, a judge ducked Heath's lawsuit, ruling that he should have filed it instead as an amicus curiae brief in Lake's case, which Heath complied with and did along with Alexander Haberbush of the Lex Rex Institute. In response to the lower courts’ contention that procedural challenges must be brought before an election, otherwise, they are barred by the doctrine of laches, Heath said in his brief that Lake had no way of knowing before the election that these violations were occurring, and they weren't procedural violations.

“[H]er objections regarding verification were never objections to Maricopa’s existing election procedures but, rather, objections to the fact that votes were illegally counted,” he argued. He cited case law which distinguished the doctrine of laches from barring claims about “alleged acts of misconduct that occurred prior to an election” versus “acts of alleged misconduct that occurred during the ‘voting process.’

---

Of course the irregularities were not procedural in nature they constituted vote fraud on the part of Maricopa Count.

The Judge is using tortured, circular logic by which he will only consider provable fraud (one of the most difficult, if not often impossible to prove legals claims) and then classified that same fraudulent act as a procedural issue to bar Lake from actually investigating and presenting proof of the fraud claims he incorrectly mandated to satisfy his ludicrously incorrect, made up out of whole cloth standard that only demonstrably proven fraud rises to occasion to overturn the results of a clearly stolen election.

Gee, even trying to describe tortured circular logic this judge used to shut down Kari Lake and deny her full and fair hearing to even present her obvious and irrefutable evidence of open Maricopa County vote fraud and manipulation produces a tortured circular logic explanation that is barely comprehensible. Sorry 'bout that folks. I tried my best.

I pray that even fair minded Democrats are getting fed up with judges using arguments of standing and procedural technicalities to block courts dismissing legal challenges to transparently stolen elections via in your face, open and obvious vote fraud

[Don@VB]

Reviewing signatures on mail in ballots is where the big numbers are, and it should be easy, clear cut evidence of fraud.

[bigbob]

this sounds interesting but if he wins it will be like throwing a hail Mary pass to win the Superbowl...from the moon.

[mewzilla]

AZ related...

EXCLUSIVE: BPro’s TotalVote “Centralized State-Wide Top-Down System” Used in Multiple States Is Internet Connected, Non-Certified, Connects with Dominion and ERIC, and Allows “Plug-Ins” That Can Change Results – And It’s Been Hidden in Election Discussions to Date