I read the article. The Mail draws a lot of conclusions that just are not there. For example the headline reads “DeSantis says Trump should’ve given up power like George Washington after election loss and January 6.” But reading the body of the article I fail to see where DeSantis makes reference to the election loss or January 6. The article assumes that is what he is implying which is why the article puts in “drawing sharp contrast with Trump.” as if this was direct from DeSantis. It wasn’t.
This and other Daily Mail articles are being very selective in how they present what was said.
Trump did not and does not have the best character. What he did have and I hope still has was the character necessary to face down the usual cabal of elite warmongering grifters that view D.C. as a fiefdom and us their serfs. He made some terrible choices on who to put in and trust in positions of authority. I think he has learned that lesson.
And this is why I’m sad. If only Trump would be like Reagan, he would be perfect, but he is too proud and scattershot.Can you imagine if he had been 100 percent focused during his term?
I read the article. The Mail draws a lot of conclusions that just are not there. For example the headline reads “DeSantis says Trump should’ve given up power like George Washington after election loss and January 6.” But reading the body of the article I fail to see where DeSantis makes reference to the election loss or January 6. The article assumes that is what he is implying which is why the article puts in “drawing sharp contrast with Trump.” as if this was direct from DeSantis. It wasn’t.
In other words, he made his point through inference rather than saying it directly - like a true politician. His years as a lawyer have paid off.
Thumbs up for the good try.