This bolsters my contention that in election lawsuits by Republicans the courts are simply refusing to look at any and all evidence.
The Dems KNOW if they steal it there is not a court ANYWHERE that will touch it, SO why not steal it NO CONSEQUENCES!!!
Agreed. When the left screams that the Courts ruled that no evidence of fraud was found, they leave out the part where the Courts all dismissed claims on technical reasons without allowing or viewing any evidence of said fraud.
That’s exactly what’s been happening.
In the 2020 election challenge in Arizona a judge allowed a random 2000 ballots to be sampled for signature matches.
The Democrats’ own handwriting expert testified that ELEVEN PERCENT of the ballots did not pass a signature match check. This, in a state decided by less than 1% of the vote. The judge then did not allow any more ballots to be signature match checked and threw the case out.
Anybody think the same BS didn’t happen in 2022 in Arizona OR that there was a real signature match check done? Puhleaze. We all know the answer to that.
AZ court was ridiculous, they basically admitted the election was screwed up, but ruled since no “intent” was shown in all that confusion to affect the election that the election stands.