Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: janetjanet998
FWIW, has to do with federal grand juries and Brady material, per Fedzilla...

9-11.233 - PRESENTATION OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE In United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735 (1992), the Supreme Court held that the Federal courts' supervisory powers over the grand jury did not include the power to make a rule allowing the dismissal of an otherwise valid indictment where the prosecutor failed to introduce substantial exculpatory evidence to a grand jury. It is the policy of the Department of Justice, however, that when a prosecutor conducting a grand jury inquiry is personally aware of substantial evidence that directly negates the guilt of a subject of the investigation, the prosecutor must present or otherwise disclose such evidence to the grand jury before seeking an indictment against such a person. While a failure to follow the Department's policy should not result in dismissal of an indictment, appellate courts may refer violations of the policy to the Office of Professional Responsibility for review.

Bild and italics are mine. [cited in JM 9-5.001]

33 posted on 03/22/2023 9:01:51 AM PDT by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mewzilla

You really CAN indict a ham sandwich.


37 posted on 03/22/2023 9:03:40 AM PDT by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: mewzilla

thats the feds new yaak has their own rules- i believe similar


70 posted on 03/22/2023 9:49:16 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson