Posted on 03/22/2023 8:42:34 AM PDT by janetjanet998
Then why did trump call it a leak?
Did the papers report that?
“A New York Times review and interviews with election law experts strongly suggest that New York state prosecutors have never before filed an election law case involving a federal campaign. Bringing an untested case against anyone, let alone a former president of the United States, carries the risk that a court could throw out or narrow the case.”
The NYT repudiating Obama and the Mooch. Thought I'd never live to see the day.
The truly crazy aspect of this is, since Trump pre-empted the perp walk, Democrats immediately started hot-polling the possible scenarios, and now it is obvious that Bluegums miscue would bring the entire GOP back home to President Trump.
After the bioweapon, after the steal, after all their efforts to "Yezhov" President Trump, they were going to permit a fugly fat f-ck whose momma had a do-nothing job at nothing-doing Manhattan Community College and a daddy who couldn't cut it as a stock broker so he too, ended up on patronage, at NYC's Urban League.
Oh yeah, Bluegums, as for your bio and your CV, got one word for you: LOFL.
That is the only possible determination that would produce that New York Times tweet telling Boogums to craft an exit strategy now. Today.
RE: Meanwhile, homicides have risen 100%.
Once I would have cared.
A small number are not Dem voters. As Pat Buchanan’s sister Bay said: “My brain filters everything through politics.” True of me.
RE: How many of the 23 are registered Demsz? I’m sure more than 50%
No offense but NYC and DC jurors are 90% always Dem.
I don’t have time to get literal specific figures right now so doubt me if you wish. Maybe it’s 89% (😇)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.