“ You only need one juror who isn’t corrupt, and the case will go down in flames”
In a Grand Jury it is a majority vote as to whether to indict or not. One or two dissenting jurors are not enough to avoid indictment.
Actually for Bragg it may be best if the Grand Jury declines to indict Trump. Bragg probably has a pretty weak case and legally suspect. If he goes to trial and loses, he looks like a fool. If the Grand Jury declines to indict then Bragg can say he did all he could do, blame the Grand Jury system.
I was unclear: I was referring to the trial jury
Still puzzled about WHERE we’re being driven, by WHOM are we being driven and, more importantly, to WHERE ARE WE BEING DRIVEN?
If you think only CATTLE are DRIVEN, WATCH & SHARE THIS VITAL FILM!
https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-shadow-state-documentary_4877950.html
Let me add: I don’t know NY procedure, only CA. There’s a reasonable chance, if this showing was made in CA, that the defense could get a directed verdict. Everyone is saying it, and everyone is correct: this is an extremely rickety case, and the DA will be playing with fire if he chooses to bring it
Weak case? No case.
Costello nuked them.