Posted on 03/20/2023 3:20:13 PM PDT by TexasGunLover
...and now he's in NYC looking for another bad mash.
Yep, all the elaborate and sincere-sounding claims turned out to be false and totally made up once we saw the videos.
Yep lots and lots of faggots in NY. I bet Paul will looking to get hammered again. Hope he brought clean underwear.
Is The California Hag planning on creating another “insurrection” when Trump supporters show up to peacefully protest?
I thought she’d already been executed for her crimes. I continue to believe absolutely zero in the headlines.
You mean, claims the attacker was a Trump supporter?
Admitting here, didn’t have the stomach to actually watch the video and see Pelosi get attacked.
But it sounded or read as if the attacker was completely unhinged and Pelosi sincerely tried but failed to escape injury.
Waiting for Twinkie to put the hammer down…
No, I meant all the sure and certain claims that it was a homosexual friend that Pelosi let into the home and all of that nonsense.
The guy brought break-in tools and broke into the house, Pelosi was trying to stay alive.
The videos show it all, the backpack, the casing of the joint, the tools, the break-in, and then listen to the victim trying to talk code to the 911 operator to send help although the intruder was listening.
little chilly this time of year
Pelosi’s lucky to be alive.
Both of them are sh**stains.
It was a near thing.
Grand Jury proceedings are directed proceedings.
In the ordinary course, the only information the Grand Jury ends up hearing is infirmation tending to show that a crime was committed, and that person T committed that crime.
The prosecutors would typically do their utmost to prevent the members of the Grand Jury from hearing any evidence to the contrary on either point. So no, no bill of indictment would or could be handed up by the Grand Jury to the judge implicating Person P. Unless! The Grand Jury is empaneled for a period of time long enough that the prosecutors eventually drop their pursuit of Person T and begin going whole hog against Person P.
In the ordinary course, the only information the Grand Jury ends up hearing is information tending to show that a crime was committed, and that person T committed that crime.
Yes, VERY directed.
Yes, no exculpatory evidence that might confuse a grand juror is allowed, lest a ham sandwich not be indicted.
The key words in your reply are "In the ordinary course" and "Unless! The Grand Jury is empaneled for a period of time long enough that the prosecutors eventually drop their pursuit of Person T and begin going whole hog against Person P."
It's been what? 9 months, after a two year investigation? Is that long enough to show that even with the heavily biased process they got the wrong guy? Will the persecutors want someone's head on a pike to show something, anything, for their efforts?
Madame Nanzi LaFarge is in NYC to get a ringside seat hoping to see blood, only she will not be knitting!
Nancy only accepted the invitation to watch if she could put out her hand for the thumbs up or thumbs down and hear the cheers.
Almost back out when they told her Trump would not be chased by a hungry lion and cougar in the arena.
True story, Richard Nixon arrived in Dallas the day before JFK was killed.
From the Richard Nixon Foundation:
It is not a very common occurence for three Presidents to be in Washington on the same day, and it is an extremely unusual event for three Presidents – current, former, or future – to be in the same city unless a political convention or a Presidential funeral is underway. But on the morning of November 22, 1963, three Presidents were in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area, within thirty miles of each other.
In Fort Worth that day, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson awoke in the Hotel Texas and prepared to board the plane that would take him on the brief flight to Love Field in Dallas, and from there to the motorcade that would enter Dealey Plaza just before 12:30 Central Standard Time.
And in Dallas that morning, Richard Nixon awoke in the Baker Hotel. There was a policeman stationed in the hallway outside his door, but the officer was there not so much to protect the former Vice President as to deter jewel thieves or autograph seekers from bothering movie star Joan Crawford who was a few doors down from RN.
https://www.nixonfoundation.org/2013/11/richard-nixon-november-22-1963/
RE: long locks of hair....
Paul: To be honest, my boyfriend sits behind me at my dressing table and combs and combs my hair, admiring its highlights.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.