Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: qaz123
The correct solution is for major urban areas to become new states. A single set of state laws cannot be applied to both rural and urban zones - the needs are too different. The State of Illinois and the State of Chicago would be run very differently.

Democrats won't initially like this idea any more than they like Greater Idaho, because as mentioned above they are not interested in good government - they desire to rule over the peasants. But the idea of a State of Chicago having two new Democrat Senators and more House seats than the remaining State of Illinois might tempt some of them to at least explore the idea.

26 posted on 03/18/2023 2:55:22 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Jeeves

State Level Electoral College.

Each county gets 3 votes.

Your guy/gal sweeps with more than 66% they get all 3

50.1 to 65.9…..your guy/gal gets 2 votes, loser gets 1. That way they can’t bitch about it not being overwhelming.

I doubt you’d have a Democrat Governor, Lt Gov, SecState, AG in any but 3 or 4 states.


31 posted on 03/18/2023 3:55:51 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Jeeves

And no amount of fraud in the cities or Democrat areas could overcome that


32 posted on 03/18/2023 3:59:07 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson