Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.K. says it's glow time, declares nuclear energy "environmentally sustainable", giving it access to the same investment incentives as renewable energy
Hotair ^ | 03/16/2023 | Beege Welborn

Posted on 03/16/2023 6:41:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Wowsers. What a difference a cold, dark, expensive winter makes.

HUGE!

Chancellor Hunt unveiling Great British Nuclear during his spring budget statement now: Officially announcing funding of Sizewell C, classification of #nuclear as green in the UK, targeting 25% nuclear for the UK Grid & a new SMR competition w/ gvmt funding! #uranium

— Art Hyde (@JekyllCapital) March 15, 2023

In the culmination of an effort and advocacy begun by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, U.K. chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced yesterday that nuclear energy was being reclassified as “environmentally sustainable” in Britain. That’s not just semantics, It opens nuclear up to all the financing, incentives and opportunities available to any of the so-called Green/renewable energy strategies they’ve been pursuing for the past decade or so. It’s basically the government’s official blessing to go forth and try to multiply.

Nuclear power is to be classed as “environmentally sustainable” in the UK’s green taxonomy, giving it access to the same investment incentives as renewable energy, chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced in his spring budget 2023 speech on Wednesday (15 March).

Hunt also said the government would launch the first competition for small modular reactors. It will be completed by the end of this year and if demonstrated as viable “we will co-fund this exciting new technology”.

He announced the launch of Great British Nuclear, a government-backed agency which will he said will bring down costs and provide opportunities across the nuclear supply chain to help provide up to 25% of the country’s electricity by 2050, up from around 15% today.

Great announcements from UK yesterday!

👉#Nuclear listed as '#Environmentally #Sustainable' under #taxonomy (i.e. on an equal footing with #renewables)
👉1st competition for #smallmodularreactors this year
👉Official launch of #GreatBritishNuclear


https://t.co/CX72WCj0l8

— Jessica Johnson (@ajjohnson100) March 16, 2023

If their sentiments are any indication, the Sunak government would like nuclear reactors to multiply as quickly and safely as possible, and are all in on facilitating that end.

…Nuclear power is a key pillar of Britain’s net zero strategy. The government wants to build both large-scale and small modular reactors and has committed to approving eight before the end of the decade. The private sector has been slow to come forward with cash, despite a redesign of the financing mechanism rolled out by government in hope it would attract pension and infrastructure funds.

…A competition for Small Modular Reactors will be completed by the end of this year and if the selected technology is proven viable, the government will co-fund the winning project.

Rolls Royce Holdings Plc was awarded £210 million of government money in 2021 toward the development of this technology. The company is expected to enter the competition.

In a bald statement of fact that has to be galling to the rabid renewable faction so invested in making their fellow Brits’ lives miserable, Hunt laid out the plain truth – the U.K. must have something reliable to back up all the condition-dependent renewable energy sources. “Condition” meaning something must blow or shine before any power is generated.

…Hunt told MPs: “We have increased the proportion of electricity generated from renewables from under 10% to nearly 40%.

But because the wind doesn’t always blow and the sun doesn’t always shine, we will need another critical source of cheap and reliable energy. And that is nuclear.”

They’ve found out repeatedly this winter that is a truism. And it’s not only the weather that takes renewables out (as I’ve posted on before) – their reliability and maintenance issues, especially for wind, are hardly up to par for the bazillions being spent and the lives dependent upon the technology. You can’t keep lugging diesel generators to the highlands to try to keep them warm, or ferrying turbines back and forth from ocean wind farms that haven’t even become operational yet, and are already breaking down.

The country needs something humming along in the background. Unfortunately, they came to that realization a little late in the renewables game after self-righteously planning on shuttering everything.

…In recent years the UK has generated about 15% of its power from its fleet of commercial nuclear power plants, but most are being retired this decade, with the last one – Sizewell B – due to close in 2035.

Since 2000, the UK has seen permanent reactor shutdowns at Hinkley Point A, Bradwell, Calder Hall, Hunterston, Oldbury, Sizewell, Chapelcross, Dungeness and Wylfa.

The only remaining operating plants are nine reactors across four sites at Hartlepool, Heysham, Sizewell B and Torness. There are two plants under construction at Hinkley Point C and another two in the pipeline at Sizewell C.

Everyone loves to be sold a bill of unicorn dreams, and it’s just the rudest shock when it doesn’t work out.

Now, it’s all about MAYDAY, MAYDAY and the “fast track.” Better late than never.

Let the shrieking begin.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: donatefreerepublic; environment; greenenergy; nuclearenergy; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 03/16/2023 6:41:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Pikachu face


2 posted on 03/16/2023 6:44:52 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ll be the Debbie, don’t expect the nuclear miracle here on the states. The California/west coast and New England nuts will fight it all the way.


3 posted on 03/16/2023 6:46:50 PM PDT by Liaison (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Stupid heads out-gassing violently as we read right now. Hopefully sufficient pressure builds in the reactors on their shoulders to split open their cores.


4 posted on 03/16/2023 6:47:53 PM PDT by blackdog ((Z28.310) Forget "Global Warming", new grants are for "Galaxy Dimming")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is nothing environmentlly questionable about nuclear energy...except, you know, the disposal of waste heat and spent fuel, and the occasional core meltdown.


5 posted on 03/16/2023 6:50:03 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liaison

Haven’t you learned anything lately. They will just redefine the terms used to generate nuclear energy. Uranium will be Greenium. Reactors will be Passivaters. Cooling towers will become Unicorn Vents. Radiation will become Aurora-Carbonallis. And so on. Newspeak can fix any perception.


6 posted on 03/16/2023 6:54:53 PM PDT by blackdog ((Z28.310) Forget "Global Warming", new grants are for "Galaxy Dimming")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

I wonder what the death rate per workman by energy form is, and the payout for annual injuries per workman.


7 posted on 03/16/2023 6:57:48 PM PDT by ansel12 (NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A rare burst of sanity in the U.K. High time. Now if the US would only follow suit. SMRs are the ideal form of distributed generation.


8 posted on 03/16/2023 7:00:02 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Poverty tends to clarify people’s ability to think.


9 posted on 03/16/2023 7:07:20 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (Biden will mess up the Ukraine worse than Afghanistan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Huh.

Guess the nook industry in Britain finally clued in and got the cash to the right Swiss bank accounts.


10 posted on 03/16/2023 7:19:26 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jiim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liaison

“...don’t expect the nuclear miracle here on the states...”
-
Two new reactors are coming on line in Georgia this year.
Of course, they are both way past their original time frame,
and way over their original cost estimate.


11 posted on 03/16/2023 7:42:04 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

yes, yes, yes


12 posted on 03/16/2023 7:46:49 PM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

yes, yes, yes


13 posted on 03/16/2023 7:47:10 PM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Burning fossil fuels makes plants grow faster now, and in the long run also saves life on earth from death in the next ice-age. Fossil fuels are actually the most environmentally sustainable fuels, but unfortunately our governments are too stupid to realize it.


14 posted on 03/16/2023 8:01:47 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“cheap and reliable”

Nuclear is not cheap.

Many of the French reactors are down.


15 posted on 03/16/2023 8:02:06 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

lol green morons shut them all down 50 YEARS ago!!! now they decide they were WRONG (as usual) and are now saying Nuclear is the way of the future!

The left is INSANE!!!!!!!!!


16 posted on 03/16/2023 8:11:18 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not sure it has been environmental concerns that has been the factor explaining the reluctance of Tory and Labour governments in building nuke plants, it is the enormous start up costs and time it takes to build them.

Politicians are short termist and want results they can brag about to the electorate for the money they invest.


17 posted on 03/17/2023 12:00:09 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Reality hitting the Brits upside the head with a 2x4 and restoring some sense.


18 posted on 03/17/2023 1:00:11 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how thery control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah; SeekAndFind

The death rate per kwh produced is 5 times greater for rooftop solar than for nuclear, and lower even more than wind.

https://www.engineering.com/story/whats-the-death-toll-of-nuclear-vs-other-energy-sources


19 posted on 03/17/2023 1:17:15 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how thery control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Very interesting article!

Thank you!


20 posted on 03/17/2023 1:29:41 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson