Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pierrem15

Yes, but also that the British military was hardly a formidable force on land.


21 posted on 03/11/2023 10:39:19 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

“...the British military was hardly a formidable force on land.”

Wellesley sure improved things in the next 20-30 years.


34 posted on 03/11/2023 11:00:30 AM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Yes, but also that the British military was hardly a formidable force on land.

They were always very well trained, but just much smaller than most of their continental competitors because Britain focused on its sea power. The Zulu wars and then the Boer War showed the limitations of that approach. In 1914 the Imperial General Staff already told the government that in any big European war the 100,000 men of the professional British army would be gone in a few months, and so it was.

51 posted on 03/11/2023 11:59:03 AM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson