Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

The so-called “renewable” power sources, wind and/or solar, cannot, BY DESIGN, possibly keep up with the rate of retirement of of the hydrocarbon fuel power plants or the aging uranium-fueled Light Water Reactor power plants.

This is leading inevitably to the wholesale adoption of Very Small Nuclear Reactor power plants, which are already developed, and can be ramped up relatively quickly, as they are of modular design, the components can be delivered by rail transport or even trucked in on semi trailers to the site, and the site prepared in short while, in close proximity to the point where the power is to be consumed.

These Very Small Nuclear Reactors have been under development for several decades now, and overcome most of the objections previously raised against the use of nuclear power.

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/small-nuclear-power-reactors.aspx

This is the bridge to the future, if the intention is to rescue the economy is in any way serious. Of course, total collapse of the economy is also the way to destroy capitalism forever, and that may be the real objective.

In which case there shall be no viable future to which a bridge may be built.


28 posted on 03/10/2023 6:01:46 AM PST by alloysteel (Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what's right. - Isaac Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel

wholesale adoption of Very Small Nuclear Reactor power plants

Just where are you getting your information?

In my opinion based on what I see in the “news”. There is no such thing as a working model of a VSNR PP.

https://www.protocol.com/bulletins/nuscale-smr-approval-nuclear-power

As an example, the NRC less than a year ago certified the plans for such a power plant. First plans ever approved, much less an operational plant which could be fifty years down the road based on the actions of the NRC.

An example everyone might have on their mind would be the US Navy who has basically run such in the Nuclear Navy for years, but those plants are not just removable from submarines and approved for land base power generation.

The worst case scenario, would be government foot dragging based on the historic ESG and environmental insanity we are witnessing today. Who in their right mind is going to spend billions on an actual plant using the only certified plan in hopes it well receive approval?

There is more. Much more.


55 posted on 03/11/2023 3:45:52 AM PST by wita (Under oath since 1966 in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: alloysteel

In your defense, I think you have also nailed it below.

Of course, total collapse of the economy is also the way to destroy capitalism forever, and that may be the real objective.


56 posted on 03/11/2023 3:50:23 AM PST by wita (Under oath since 1966 in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson