>>>>You seem to be obsessed with murder
>>I’m not obsessed with murder at all.
You seem to be.
>>It’s just the perfect point to demonstrate the depths of evil you go will support to defend Trump.
I defend Trump as a brilliant executive and economist, not as a pastor.
>>He says he can murder someone in broad daylight and not lose supporters like you, and clearly you have endlessly defended him over it. That’s why the point keeps dragging on forever, your inability to admit the horrible sinful nature of that statement.
Again, if you had a sense of humor you would laugh at Trump’s unseriousness. But I understand your obsession. That is all you have left to smear him with. So-called Russian collusion was a despicable hoax; the Ukraine phone call, characterized as bullying, was another hoax; the release of his tax returns, perfectly in order, may have caused Rachel Maddow to hit the bars after work; the claim that he was involved in the J6 protest was a hoax (however, it now appears the FBI was involved, and even instigated the violence); the rape charge was dropped; the Trump University case was another political hit job, fueled by a set of standards that would sink every university if they were forced to live up to the same standards; and so forth. He is squeaky clean, from a criminal perspective, and that gives the left nightmares. LOL!
>>Even if it was a sick joke, it is still at its evil core a prideful boast of the despicable level of control Trump has over his sycophants.
Like I said, that is all you have left.
>>>>You seem to be too ignorant to be a hypocrite.
>>Hilarious, that you would now try to use my supposed ignorance, as your lame defense of your own ignorance for not knowing Trump himself went to the Ivy League, that I had to educate you about. Trump and Alinsky tactics do go hand in hand.
You prove your ignorance by not understanding the difference between a Wharton business degree and a Harvard law degree. The term “Ivy League” is synonomous with elitism. Elitists embrace and justify the actions other elitists, no matter how destructive; but they hate Trump. I am certain that went right over your head.
>>>>It was a joke, but obviously not to those under the spell of DeSantis.
>>I’m not under any spells of DeSantis, nor does he appear to practice mind control as does Trump.
Your incessant whining about Trump is unbecoming. But I understand. That seems to be ingrained into the leftist mindset.
>>I’ve told you repeatedly, bring me something worthy to criticize DeSantis of, and if he deserves it I’ll criticize him.
I did. He has caused division among the MAGA people; he has become buddy-buddy with RINOs; and he went out of his way to support a RINO candidate over a MAGA conservative.
As an aside, the last mentioned may have been a requirement for initiation. How better to you prove you qualify as a member of the Good-Old-Boys Club than to stab someone in the back.
Almost forgot: on, and off, and back-on Never-Trumper Rich Lowry, the editor of National Review and a contributor to Politico, wrote an opinion piece in Politico a while back that suggested liberals should welcome the rise of DeSantis.
>>But so far all you have is your failed Ivy League attempt that blew up in your face, and some laughable long distance guilt by association charges.
You are simply too ignorant to understand the difference. Sad.
Dan
Wrong again. I’m a righteous man, who supports other righteous men, and righteous actions. I don’t support narcissistic serial adulterers, who openly support sodomy, or make sick jokes about murdering people in the street, just so they can brag about how they have lured good men astray from the Bible, and into their hypnotic support of a deceitful master instead. Since that seems to make you happy, enjoy your subservience.