Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC chair: candidates must sign loyalty pledge if they want to join 2024 debates
The Guardian ^ | 2/26/23 | Maya Yang

Posted on 02/28/2023 7:24:35 AM PST by 1Old Pro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: 1Old Pro

The loyalty oath is self serving for the RINO losers. It will be observed by some of the participants and ignored by others. None of the candidates should sign such obvious lopsided deck stacking. The aim of such a requirement is to hobble Donald Trump from striking back at his opponents, and looking the other way when others violate the oath. Your post is a good summation of what needs to be done to make the Republican debates worth participating in for the candidates as well as their audience.


61 posted on 02/28/2023 8:55:18 AM PST by mountainfolk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quentin Quarantino

Since the RINO Brigade put this mutt back as RNC Chairwoman for another term, I submit that we are in dire need to start a new Party.


62 posted on 02/28/2023 8:58:17 AM PST by Howie66 (Let's Go Brandon!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Beyond incompetent. They don’t give a crap about the debate. Lots of Rs actively worked to undermine Trump...where was she then? Fix the damn elections or none of this Titanic deck chair shuffling will make a kick of difference.


63 posted on 02/28/2023 9:19:25 AM PST by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quentin Quarantino

Trump’s hand picked choice to lead the organization.


64 posted on 02/28/2023 9:31:41 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Retroactively not allow them to participate in the debate, I guess. “Vacate” their participation on official records - that’ll teach ‘em.


65 posted on 02/28/2023 9:33:39 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I have no issue with this requirement. There are a lot of issues with the debate process and they are being addressed. This is for the Primary Debates, so we already have control of the moderators and the process. The certain path to defeat, is if one of our major competitors made the move to run as an “Independent”, if they lost in the primaries. That would certainly give us 4 years of a Democrat (Biden or other).


66 posted on 02/28/2023 10:05:53 AM PST by Tandem (What ever happened to personal responsibility & self-reliance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tandem
The certain path to defeat, is if one of our major competitors made the move to run as an “Independent”, if they lost in the primaries.

Then make that the pledge, not a pledge to the nominee winner.

67 posted on 02/28/2023 10:09:24 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson