Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerFRLurker

87% of a small number is still much smaller than 48% of a much bigger number.


23 posted on 02/27/2023 4:49:24 PM PST by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: joma89

87% of a small number is still much smaller than 48% of a much bigger number.

Oh so you're going by absolute numbers even though the probability of a randomly selected white woman voting Rat is lower than the probability of a randomly selected black or Latina woman doing so. Ok, if that's the standard you're using, then 35% of a large number (percentage of white men voting Rat) is larger than 87% of a small number.

The white men who vote Rat are even dumber IMO because they are voting for the party that openly discriminates against them. Yet I don't see you calling them out. I wonder why. I'm tired of Freepers giving male libtards a free pass because of their genitalia.

32 posted on 02/28/2023 9:17:49 AM PST by FormerFRLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson